Liberal nationalism - Frjálslynd þjóðhyggja

Þeir sem hafa hæst um öfgaþjóðernishyggju ættu að lesa þetta og bera saman við stefnu Samtaka Fullveldissinna.

 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

 

Liberal nationalism is a kind of nationalism identified by political philosophers who believe that there can be a "non-xenophobic"  form of nationalism compatible with liberal values of freedom, tolerance, equality, and individual rights. Ernest Renan and John Stuart Mill are often thought to be early liberal nationalists. Liberal nationalists often defend the value of national identity by saying that individuals need a national identity in order to lead meaningful, autonomous lives and that liberal democratic polities need national identity in order to function properly.

Liberal nationalism, also known as civic nationalism or civil nationalism, is the form of nationalism in which the state derives political legitimacy from the active participation of its citizenry (see popular sovereignty), from the degree to which it represents the "general will". It is often seen as originating with Jean-Jacques Rousseau and especially the social contract theories which take their name from his 1762 book The Social Contract.

Liberal nationalism lies within the traditions of rationalism and liberalism, but as a form of nationalism it is contrasted with ethnic nationalism. Membership of the civic nation is considered voluntary, as in Ernest Renan's classical definition of the nation as a "daily plebiscite" characterized by the "will to live together". Civic-national ideals influenced the development of representative democracy in countries such as the United States and France (see the United States Declaration of Independence of 1776, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789).

States in which civic forms of nationalism predominate are often (but not always) ex-settler colonies such as the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, in which ethnic nationalism is difficult to construct on account of the diversity of ethnicities within the state. A notable exception is India, an ex-plantation colony, where civic nationalism has predominated due to the country's unparalleled linguistic, religious and ethnic diversity. Civic-nationalist states are often characterized by adoption of the jus soli (law of the soil) for granting citizenship in the country, deeming all persons born within the integral territory of the state citizens and members of the nation, regardless of their parents' origin. This serves to link national identity not with a people but rather with the territory and its history, and the history of previous occupants of the territory unconnected to the current occupants are often appropriated for national myths.

Even though nationalist parties in Europe generally have ethnicity as their uniting factor, there have been notable exceptions. The Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru in the United Kingdom rarely refer to ethnicity in their nationalism.  This is usually in contrast to the ethnic nationalist British National Party. The SNP and Plaid Cymru were the first political parties to field successfully elected candidates of an ethnic minority background in the devolved institutions of their respective nations - Bashir Ahmad in the Scottish Parliament, Mohammad Asghar in the Welsh Assembly; both are Muslims of Pakistani origin.

 

Athugasemdir

[Óskar Helgi Helgason 14.8.2009 kl. 01:00]

Heill og sæll; Axel Þór !

Hygg; að þú, dagfarsprúður maðurinn, teldist seint öfgafullur vera.

Varla; þekki ég, til jafn raunsærra - sem hógværari manna, sem þú hefir reynst vera, í öllu tilliti.

Með beztu kveðjum; í Dynskógana /

Óskar Helgi Helgason 

[Jón Valur Jensson, 14.8.2009 kl. 01:32]

Ræktun þjóðernis, tungu og menningar og varðveizla þjóðarréttinda getur engan veginn talizt öfgar í sjálfu sér. Væri þessu annaðhvort samfara lítilsvirðing við aðrar þjóðir (í ýmsum birtingarmyndum) eða yfirgengilegur hroki eða í 3. lagi ef beitt væri ólöglegum, ósiðlegum meðulum til að fá stefnunni framgengt, s.s. ofbeldi, lygum o.fl. af því taginu, ÞÁ væri vissulega hægt að tala um öfgastefnu í þessu sambandi. Þannig var um bæði nazismann og fascisma Mussolinis. Sem betur fer eru fullveldissinnar og EB-innlimunarandstæðingar lausir við slíkar öfgar. Það eru ekki öfgar að vilja ekki láta land og þjóð sogast inn í evrópskt stórríki, en þeir sem vilja það, geta ekki státað af dygðum hófsemi, hygginda, hugrekkis og ábyrgðar.

[Anna Sigríður Guðmundsdóttir, 15.8.2009 kl. 22:21]

Allar öfgar eru hættulegar eins og td. hægri, vinstri, skoðanaleysi og einstefnuskoðanir sem byggðar eru á reynslu og þekkingarleysi, hefnigirni á alvarlegu stigi og óeðlileg meðvirkni.

Þess vegna er svo mikilvægt að ræða málefnanlega og með rökstuðningi um öll mál. Þannig næst jákvæður árangur fyrir alla heiðarlega borgara held ég. Enginn er betri en þú Axel til þess að ræða málefnanlega um öll mál, eftir því sem ég hef best séð til þín.